Re: Uwouldn'tHoldAThingLikeSanityAgainstAGuy? [RT]

Brian K. Martin (
Sun, 24 Mar 1996 13:42:07 -0500 (EST)

From: "Brian K. Martin" <>
Message-Id: <>
Subject: Re: Uwouldn'tHoldAThingLikeSanityAgainstAGuy? [RT]
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 13:42:07 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <> from "Muad'Dib" at Mar 24, 96 10:38:02 am

> Responding :* Re: WAD Conversion sketch
> ************
> > I agree. I was upset to see complete levels and mdl files uploaded
> > to ftp and net sites. I think the level/model editors should not
> > work with the shareware release, unless id gives an ok. I will
> > most likely hold back the next version of meddle because of this.
> This is just plain silly. It DOESN'T work with the shareware release. It
> probably WON'T work with the shareware release. This is just a test version.
Are you so sure the models will be in a completely different format in
the shareware or final release?

> Goodness, people are scared of ID software when whatever you do can only gain
> them more business. One of the few things I really hate about Quake right now
> is that it doesn't have all of the specs and stuff they promised. If it looks
> like there's no hope for getting an editor unless it's from ID, quite a few
> people will probably become disgruntled.

Uh, I think the quake specs are almost entirely complete. You have to give
people time to write things.

(i mean the new quake specs, olivier, did you release these yet?)